Welcome to The Movement, tracking the influences and debates steering politics on the right.
The Movement
The Movement

By Emily Brooks   |   Thursday, October 22

By Emily Brooks

Thursday, October 22

© Greg Nash

Warning signs emerge for MAGA populism over ObamaCare

Republicans in Congress are on a path to letting enhanced ObamaCare subsidies expire at the end of the year, a result that could amount to a dismissal — or, depending on your perspective, a betrayal — of the MAGA populism that was ascendant in the party.

Rather than heed warnings from MAGA commentators and Trump pollsters that letting the subsidies expire without any alternative plan would spell disaster for the party in the 2026 midterms, a sizeable chunk of Republicans in Congress seem to be driven more by ideological opposition to the big spending on the subsidies and to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in general.

A few House Republicans I’ve spoken to privately say they don't think the subsidies will be extended — leaving the GOP to take a gamble in the midterm elections where Democrats are waiting to accuse Republicans of betraying their voters on affordability, since the expiration will mean increases in health care premiums.

That dynamic is raising alarm bells for those interested in holding together the MAGA coalition and the influx of working-class voters into the party.

Matt Boyle, the Washington bureau chief for Breitbart News who is very well connected among senior Trump administration officials, has been vocal about calling for a medium- or longer-term extension of the health care subsidies to take the issue away from Democrats in the 2026 midterms and 2028 presidential election.

“If the Republicans do this right or even close to right I think they can take health care away from the Democrats as a political issue,” Boyle said. He pointed the finger at GOP leaders from President Trump’s first term who declined to repeal and replace ObamaCare in 2017, calling an extension of the subsidies a “duct tape solution to Barack Obama’s Unaffordable Care Act.” 

“They hold it together with some duct tape until such time as the real America first leaders who have replaced the loser globalists like [former GOP Speaker] Paul Ryan take over and actually come up with real plans about this,” Boyle said.

A July polling memo from Trump campaign pollsters Tony Fabrizio and Bob Ward found voter support in competitive House districts for the generic Republican candidate would crater from a 3-point deficit to a 15-point deficit if the subsidies aren’t extended.

Polling from the health care policy nonprofit KFF released last week found that 72 percent of Republicans enrolled in ObamaCare plans support extending the enhanced subsidies. A previous KFF report found that in some of the most competitive congressional districts, those on marketplace plans could be enough to swing a close election: “In the 10 most competitive districts in the last election, the margin of victory was fewer than 6,000 votes. There are at least 27,000 ACA Marketplace enrollees in each of these districts.”

And in a reflection of how MAGA and moderates could come together on the issue, Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) — a MAGA favorite in the Senate — teamed up with moderate appropriator Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) on a plan to extend the enhanced tax credits for two years, with reforms like income caps and an elimination of zero-premium plans.

But Republicans opposed to the subsidies stress that they never supported the COVID-era subsidy enhancements, which were signed into law by former President Biden, and even Republicans who are open to extensions say they would need substantial reforms. Others, as I wrote in last week’s edition of The Movement, won’t accept any extension that fails to add prohibitions on plans that cover abortions.

While various groups of moderates are working on compromise plans to extend the subsidies with reforms like income caps, House GOP leaders have said they’re working on releasing an alternate health care plan that may not extend the subsidies at all, and their messaging centers on ObamaCare being broken and trying to put the blame on Democrats for high health care premiums.

Fabrizio spoke to House Republicans in the Republican Study Committee, the largest conservative caucus in the House, whose members generally oppose extending the subsidies, last week. Rather than focus on the subsidies, though, he placed a lot of focus on Trump's moves to reduce drug prices. A GOP aide said Fabrizio presented new polling showing that Americans were more likely to vote for a candidate who reduced drug prices than a candidate who extended ObamaCare subsidies — another way to address voter concerns about affordability.

MAGA World operators have privately expressed concern that Republicans seem to be OK with not extending the subsidies and taking a gamble in the midterm elections, and that Republicans won’t rally around a GOP plan unless Trump pushes them to do so. An ObamaCare subsidy expiration would come on top of Republicans implementing reforms to Medicaid in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, though those reforms won’t start until after the midterms.

Ahead of Thanksgiving, a White House proposal to extend the subsidies for two years leaked in news reports. But the administration backed off releasing any plan after Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) cautioned the president’s advisers that most House Republicans don’t want to extend the subsidies, The Wall Street Journal reported.

For now, Trump is letting Congress take the lead. He said last week that “ObamaCare is horrible health care” and expressed support for sending money directly to people to “buy their own health care” rather than subsidizing insurance companies, which some Republicans have aimed to turn into legislative plans boosting health savings account-like programs.

But while the hour is late, there could still be time for Trump to mount a last-minute push.

“I think that whatever President Trump decides will be what Congress does,” Boyle said.

 

Welcome to The Movement, a new weekly newsletter looking at the influences and debates on the right in Washington. I'm Emily Brooks, House leadership reporter at The Hill. Tell me what’s on your radar: ebrooks@thehill.com.

Not already on the list? Subscribe here

 
 

MEASURING THE FACTIONS IN THE GOP

 

The Manhattan Institute conducted a fascinating survey aimed at defining the attitudes and factions that make up the current Republican coalition.

Of the “Current GOP” — which it defines as all 2024 Trump voters regardless of party registration, plus registered Republicans who didn’t vote for Trump — about 65 percent are “Core Republicans” who have consistently backed GOP presidential candidates since at least 2016, and 29 percent are recent first-time GOP voters, dubbed the “New Entrant GOP.”

The New Entrant GOP is less conservative on policy.

• They’re more supportive of taxation over spending cuts: 48 percent said people in the middle-to-upper-income brackets should pay higher taxes, while 47 percent said nobody should pay higher taxes and the government should cut spending. Among the current GOP, just 30 percent support higher taxes, and 63 percent oppose higher taxes and support spending cuts.

• They’re more open to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs: New Entrants were split, with 45 percent saying DEI should be illegal and 46 percent saying the programs were necessary remedies to historic racism and oppression. The whole current GOP had 59 percent saying DEI should be illegal.

• They’re more open to medical and surgical interventions for transgender minors: New Entrants were again split, with 49 percent supporting gender-affirming care for minors, while 45 percent said gender-affirming care for minors should not be allowed. That is far less conservative than the current GOP, 72 percent of which opposed medical and surgical transitioning for minors, with just 22 percent saying it should be allowed.

On tolerance for racism and antisemitism in the party and political movement...

• Fifteen percent of the current GOP identified as holding racist views, and 12 percent identified as holding antisemitic views. Younger generations are more openly prejudiced: For those younger than 50 years old, 31 percent said they hold racist views and 25 percent held antisemitic views. Newcomers to the party are more likely to self-identify as racist, with 32 percent of New Entrants saying they hold racist views, compared with 8 percent of Core Republicans.

• The current GOP coalition is more hostile to antisemitism than to racist views, with 48 percent saying those with antisemitic views “aren’t welcome and don’t represent what I stand for,” compared with 36 percent for racist views.

What does this mean for the GOP coalition in 2026 and 2028? 

•  “The durability of the expanded Republican coalition is uncertain — especially when it comes to its newest members,” the Manhattan Institute’s Jesse Arm and Matthew Knee write.

•  “When asked how they would vote if a congressional election were held today, only 56% of New Entrant Republicans said they would definitely vote Republican again, and 28% said they probably would. Under-50 Republicans show similar softness: just 59% say they would definitely vote GOP in a House race, and one in ten say they would vote for a Democrat.”

Read the full analysis here, or Jesse Arm’s thread on X breaking down the results here.

 
 

QATAR QUESTION SPLITS MAGA

 

A new litmus test is splitting the MAGA coalition: Is Qatar an important U.S. ally in the complicated Middle East region, or a terror-sponsoring enemy that should be shunned?

The Gulf country is home to the U.S. Al Udeid Air Base and was instrumental in helping President Trump secure a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas. But to provocateur Laura Loomer, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Mark Levin and other pro-Israel conservatives on the right, Qatar is a supporter of Islamic terrorism and the Muslim Brotherhood.

The rift bubbled up when a group of MAGA influencers started posting about their Thanksgiving trips to Qatar, perusing restaurants and the Formula 1 Qatar Grand Prix, and getting a wave of criticism from Loomer in return. (Will Sommer has a roundup in The Bulwark.) 

And that criticism only increased after a slew of global power players descended on Doha, Qatar, over the weekend for the Doha Forum — including not only Bill Gates and Hillary Clinton, but also Donald Trump Jr., Tucker Carlson, and Trump adviser Alex Bruesewitz.

Cruz listed a slew of questions for Carlson to ask Qatar’s prime minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, in an on-stage interview about Qatar's alleged affiliations with terrorists and whether it was paying influencers to attend the Doha Forum.

Carlson started off his interview with the prime minister asking about whether Qatar financed terror and hosted Hamas, referencing Cruz — to which the prime minister replied that all of his country's aid to Gaza was delivered with the awareness of Israel and the U.S., saying there is “no basis” to claims that Qatar was financing Hamas. By the end of the interview, Carlson said he was buying a home in Qatar in defiance of critics who accuse him — falsely, he said — of taking money from Qatar. 

An infuriated Loomer posted: “The whole point of Doha Forum is to normalize terrorists through financial bribery and unregistered foreign lobbying so that Qatar can start undermining US foreign policy and mainstream Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood around the world …. The Trump administration needs to get the Qatar problem under control. It’s wildly inappropriate for Qatar to have this much influence over US politics.”

More: Hill TV’s Robby Soave and Niall Stanage broke down the Qatar outrage.

 
 

ON MY CALENDAR

 
  • Wednesday, Dec. 10: Reason hosts a debate on whether Big Tech does more good than harm. Reason’s Robby Soave and Elizabeth Nolan Brown debate the affirmative against Breaking Points’s Emily Jashinsky and Ryan Grim. 7 p.m. at Miracle Theatre in Washington, D.C.
  • Friday, Dec. 12: The Hudson Institute hosts a discussion on “Antisemitism as a National Security Threat” in Washington, D.C.
  • Thursday-Saturday, Dec. 18-21: Turning Point USA’s "AmericaFest" conference in Phoenix, Ariz.
 
 

THREE MORE THINGS

 

1. PIERS MORGAN TAKES ON NICK FUENTES

Nick Fuentes joined Piers Morgan’s show on Monday, where the British host took a starkly different approach from that of Tucker Carlson in October. Morgan confronted Fuentes about some of his most incendiary past statements. Responding to a clip of himself saying “Jews are running society. Women need to shut the f--- up. Blacks need to be in prison for the most part. And we would live in paradise,” Fuentes said that was “100 percent true.” He agreed he is a racist. He reaffirmed that he thinks Hitler is “really f---ing cool” — “And I’m tired of pretending he’s not, to be honest.” In a shift from his previous questioning of how many Jewish people were killed in the Holocaust, Fuentes seemed to agree that at least 6 million Jews were killed, but took issue with laws in other countries that criminalize questioning that number.

 

2. MIKE JOHNSON TAKES HEAT, BUT APPEARS SAFE

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) got plenty of heat last week from frustrated members of the House GOP last week, with Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) most notably asserting that he would not win the Speakership today. But don’t expect any chair-vacating moves: Even Johnson’s biggest GOP critics and antagonists in the House tell me he is safe, for now. “He’s going to be Speaker until President Trump doesn’t want him to be Speaker,” said Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.).

 

3. VANCE: ANTISEMITISM NOT RISING ON RIGHT

Vice President Vance said in an interview with NBC News that he does not see antisemitism as a rising problem on the right: “Judging anybody based on their skin color or immutable characteristics, I think, is fundamentally anti-American and anti-Christian,” Vance said. “I do think it’s important to call this stuff out when I see it. I also, when I talk to young conservatives, I don’t see some simmering antisemitism that’s exploding.”

“Do I think that the Republican Party is substantially more antisemitic than it was 10 or 15 years ago? Absolutely not,” Vance said. “In any bunch of apples, you have bad people. But my attitude on this is we should be firm in saying antisemitism and racism is wrong. ... I think it’s kind of slanderous to say that the Republican Party, the conservative movement, is extremely antisemitic.”

 
 

WHAT I'M READING

 
  • Politico’s Ian Ward: What I Learned Discussing Israel with Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon and Marjorie Taylor Greene
  • New York Magazine’s Sarah Jones: The Right’s Post-Trump Civil War Is Already Underway
  • New York Times’s Ann E. Marimow: Conservative Project at Supreme Court Meets Trump’s Push to Oust Officials
  • The Atlantic’s Jonathan Chait: The Intellectual Vacuity of the National Conservatives
  • Washington Examiner’s Peter Laffin: Pro-life sold out for a seat at Trump’s table. Now it’s out in the cold
  • Tim Chapman in the Washington Examiner: The case for a conservative reformation


Thanks for reading! Have some feedback? Tips?
Let me know what's on your mind: ebrooks@thehill.com 

 
The Hill on FacebookThe Hill on X - TwitterThe Hill on InstagramThe Hill on LinkedIn The Hill on YouTube

Privacy Policy   |   View in Browser    |   Manage Subscriptions
Sign Up for Other Newsletters   |   Unsubscribe 

 

400 N Capitol Street NW Suite 650, Washington, DC 20001
Copyright © 1998 - 2025 Nexstar Media Inc.   |   All Rights Reserved.