Welcome to Chris Stirewalt's weekly newsletter from The Hill.
The Hill and Pluribus News Present
The Hill and Pluribus News Present

By Chris Stirewalt  |  Thursday, October 22

By Chris Stirewalt

Thursday, October 22

AP

A top-down crisis in democratic legitimacy 

[Watch Whole Hog Politics live: Join us today at 9 a.m. ET at TheHill.com as Chris Stirewalt and host Bill Sammon break down this week’s political news and answer questions from a live online audience.]

If you’d like to understand the special kind of political dysfunction that paralyzes American politics, just consider two numbers: 16 and 97.

You live in a country where Congress has a 16 percent job approval rating and had a 97 percent incumbency retention rate in the previous elections. Americans say they hate the way Congress works and yet keep sending the same exact lawmakers back to Washington. 

People who participate in elections — particularly primary elections — are prone to think that their representatives are doing a good job but that it’s the rest of those people who are the problem. This prevents voters from doing what would otherwise be the rational thing and voting out the incumbents. Add in gerrymandering and a highly geographically sorted electorate and you have a doom loop of dissatisfaction and dysfunction.

We previously had an inverted version of the phenomenon in voters’ confidence in elections. In 2024, only 44 percent of American voters expressed any significant confidence that the ballots in that year’s presidential election would be counted accurately. Yet, at the same time, 76 percent of voters said they were confident that their own “state or local government will run a fair and accurate election this November.”

It was the same story as with Congress: “I think there’s lots of election fraud, but not in my neighborhood.” 

While it’s a bummer that so many people — mostly Republicans — believed that our national elections would be illegitimate, the implications were blunted by the fact that they believed their own votes would be cast and counted fairly. Like in a lot of things, humans easily harbor deep suspicions about strangers and people far away, but tend to operate in higher trust with those around them. 

That gap, unfortunately, is closing.

A recent Marist College poll found that an all-time low of 66 percent of voters expressed confidence in their local elections, with more than a third expressing little to no confidence. 

What’s changed since 2024 is that Democrats and independents are catching up in expressing increasing anxiety about the vote. In fact, independents are now more likely than Republicans to mistrust their own elections. We needn’t wonder why. 

Riverside County, Calif., Sheriff Chad Bianco made news this week when he ordered his deputies to seize more than 500,000 ballots from last year’s California gerrymandering referendum, in which the Democratic-backed proposal won by more than 3.3 million votes. 

Given the margins, it’s hugely unlikely that anything Bianco could find would overturn the result. And as Arizona Republicans found out in their own audit of that state’s 2020 presidential results, ballot canvassing is neither easy nor suitable work for novices. But Bianco, a Republican, is running third in a donnybrook of a California gubernatorial primary. A high visibility raid like this not only gets attention, it suggests to California Republicans that Bianco is aligned with President Trump and his claims of widespread election fraud.

But it also tells the residents of Riverside County — a county that went for Trump in 2024 and reelected a hardcore MAGA candidate like Bianco with 60 percent of the vote in 2022 — that maybe even their own officials can’t be trusted or, worse, that some shadowy outside forces are interfering right in their own precincts.

A very shorthand version of how we arrived here goes like this: Trump exploited longstanding Republican suspicions about Democratic voter fraud to claim massive rigging in 2016 and attempted to crack down. He failed then, but Democrats, who have long claimed massive voter disenfranchisement, responded with outrage. When the pandemic disrupted the 2020 election, Democrats pressed their case to remove restrictions on ballot access. Republicans responded with claims of even more massive fraud, which the president further exploited to try to steal a second term after losing the election. That, in turn, became the Jan. 6 sacking of the Capitol. Democrats responded with an even more aggressive effort to expand ballot access, including an attempted federal elections takeover early in the Biden administration. Unable to break the legislative filibuster to do so, Democrats turned to state-level efforts, which Republicans countered with their own.

Now we have Republicans trying to break the legislative filibuster to jam through their own federal takeover of elections and the president sending out investigators from coast to coast to look for election fraud, even where the matters have already been thoroughly investigated. Now we have the threat to send ICE officers to the polls bubbling back up. Ambitious local Republicans, like Bianco, are getting in on the play. Democrats are responding in kind.

How much actual effect any of this will have on the way ballots are cast and counted is unknown. But one thing is already clear: The wild, baseless claims of fraud and disenfranchisement have seeped into the electorate and convinced an increasing number of Americans not just that the results of national elections can’t be trusted, but that their own ballots may be at risk.

What we have is a recipe not just for depressed participation, but, ultimately, a legitimacy crisis for our government and the idea of “government by the people” itself. We’re a long way from being done with this particular doom loop, so be ready for anything this fall.

[Programming alert: Watch "The Hill Sunday with Chris Stirewalt" – We’ll cover the latest here at home and abroad as both the DHS shutdown and war in Iran continue to drag on. Wanna bet on when it will end? We’ll talk to former Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler to get his take on prediction markets. And, as always, we’ll be sure to cover all the latest political news with expert analysis from our best-in-the-business panel of journalists. Be sure to catch us on NewsNation at 10 a.m. ET / 9 a.m. CT or your local CW station.]

 

Holy croakano! We welcome your feedback, so please email us with your tips, corrections, reactions & amplifications: WholeHogPolitics@TheHill.com.

If you’d like to be considered for publication, please include your name and hometown. If you don’t want your comments to be publicized, please specify.

 
Welcome
Welcome
 

NUTRITIONAL INFORMATION

 

TRUMP JOB PERFORMANCE

Average Approval

37.4%

Average Disapproval

60%

Net Score: +22.6 points

Change from one week ago:  ↓ 6.8 point (-15.8 points)

Change from one month ago:  ↓ 0.8 points (-21.8 points)

[Average includes: Quinnipiac University 38 percent approve - 56 percent disapprove; AP-NORC 38 percent approve - 60 percent disapprove; Fox News 41 percent approve - 59 percent disapprove; Reuters/Ipsos 36 percent approve - 62 percent disapprove; American Research Group 34 percent approve - 63 percent disapprove]

 

ECONOMY/HEALTH CARE REMAIN TOP OF MIND FOR VOTERS

Percentage of registered voters who said they were “extremely” or “very” concerned about the following:

Inflation: 86 percent

Health care: 81 percent

Gas prices: 80 percent

Political division: 80 percent

Unemployment: 73 percent

Iran getting a nuclear bomb: 66 percent

AI: 66 percent

Antisemitism: 63 percent

ICE: 62 percent

[Fox News poll of 1,001 registered voters, March 20-23]

Welcome
Welcome
 

ON THE SIDE

 

The end of the .300 hitter 

“There are politicians who have the ‘it factor,’ and are highly charismatic. That’s not who I am.” — Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin in an interview with Rolling Stone 

“You know what, because I’m president of the United States.” — President Trump explaining to reporters why he cast a mail-in ballot for a state legislative election in Florida despite his many denunciations of mail-in voting 

“As far as my own plans for 2028, here’s what I’ll say right now, I’m 100 percent focused on the people of Illinois. That’s not just me talking. That’s also a 2006 quote from Barack Obama.” — Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker at the annual Gridiron Dinner joking about his expected presidential run

Welcome
Welcome
 

SHORT ORDER

Florida Democrats raise November ambitions after special election wins, including Trump’s home district — Politico

 

Kamala Harris hitting the campaign trail across the South — CNN

 

Graham Platner continues to dominate in Maine Dem Senate primary — Emerson College 

 

Republicans lower expectations for unseating Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) — The Washington Post

 

Trump endorses, unendorses, reendorses Rep. Jeff Hurd (R-Colo.) — The Downballot

 

NRCC rolls out “MAGA Majority” program with former Maine Gov. Paul LePage — WGME

 

As Alaskans contemplate the end of petro-prosperity, an unusual midterm election — The New York Times

 

Crypto industry muscles up for major midterm spending — Semafor

 

GOP effort to re-gerrymander Utah comes up short — Deseret News

 
Welcome
Welcome
 

TABLE TALK

 

To thine own self be true

“There are politicians who have the ‘it factor,’ and are highly charismatic. That’s not who I am.” — Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin in an interview with Rolling Stone 

 

“You know what, because I’m president of the United States.” — President Trump explaining to reporters why he cast a mail-in ballot for a state legislative election in Florida despite his many denunciations of mail-in voting 

 

“As far as my own plans for 2028, here’s what I’ll say right now, I’m 100 percent focused on the people of Illinois. That’s not just me talking. That’s also a 2006 quote from Barack Obama.” — Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker at the annual Gridiron Dinner joking about his expected presidential run

 
 

MAIL BAG

 

“Why not initiate primaries for independent/unaffiliated/no party registered voters? Certainly seems appropriate for states where I/U/NP represent a larger percentage of the registered voters than either party. Any and all parties can decide whether to run a candidate(s) in this primary. Might have to establish guidelines for qualification (polls)? We need to find a way to give moderates/independents a voice and a home out of the storm. What am I missing?” — Tom Lamparter, Santa Rosa Beach, Fla.

Mr. Lamparter,

I don’t think you’re missing a thing! That’s kind of what Washington state has been doing since 2008 and California has been doing since 2011. The primaries — except for in presidential races (which remain partisan) and local offices (which are putatively nonpartisan) — are open to candidates from both major parties, those of minor parties and the unaffiliated. All registered voters are eligible to participate.

What you’re describing, though, is something a little different in which there would still be partisan primaries but a state would add an additional category only for unaffiliated voters. I think that would end up being … another political party by default.

This gets at one of the most vexing problems about primaries: They are fundamentally private activities that are mostly administered by public officials. In the many lawsuits filed by the major parties to block the Washington and California systems, they argued that by not allowing them to have separate contests the states were denying them their constitutional rights to freely associate. But these are state-run, taxpayer-financed public activities, so is the government obliged to fulfil the organizational needs of the parties? The courts eventually came down against the idea and let the states off the hook.

The rest of the country is a smorgasbord of primary election approaches. Twenty-three states have closed primaries for at least one party — only voters of that party and candidates from that party may participate. Another 18 states have open primaries for at least one party — anybody can vote in the primary regardless of registration or there is no partisan affiliation for registration at all. In a dozen other states, there are semi-open primaries, which means that you can change your registration to vote in either primary (or that picking a primary de facto changes your registration).

In much of the country, the states themselves are the principal organs of the parties. Yeah, there are the actual party organizations with chairmen and chairwomen and committee members, but the government is doing the heavy lifting of party formation and maintenance by setting and enforcing the rules of primary participation. I don’t think that’s good or healthy. I think that also means that if you had, essentially, a third primary for “others,” those elections would become battles for control over what would emerge as a new faction and, eventually, leave the true independents homeless yet again.

I’m much more inclined to think that having only one primary for everyone has greater benefits beyond adding a third one.

All best,

c

Welcome
Welcome
 

FOR DESSERT

 

It’s not the size of the dog in the fight …

KPNX: “Two Chihuahuas saved a Shih Tzu from a coyote attack in a Chandler [Ariz.] backyard over the weekend. Felicia, the dogs’ owner [said] she'd never seen a coyote in her neighborhood … until last Saturday morning when one jumped her fence into her backyard and bit Angel the Shih Tzu several times. … Felicia woke up to her other dogs barking at the coyote and her Ring camera confirmed the threat outside. ‘It breaks my heart when I hear the horrifying scream, but then it makes me so proud of my two little chihuahuas. The tenacity that they had. I don’t know if it’s bravery or stupidity, but they just kept going back and back at the fence, at the coyote. He wouldn’t give up, but he finally did,’ Felicia said.  Felicia rushed Angel to the vet where she was treated for four puncture wounds, one just shy of her jugular. [She is expected to make a full recovery.]”

 
 

EMAIL US!

 

Write to WholeHogPolitics@TheHill.com with your tips, kudos, criticisms, insights, rediscovered words, recipes, and, always, good jokes.

Please include your real name — first and last — and hometown. Make sure to let us know if you want to keep your submission private.

My colleague, Meera Sehgal, and I will look for your emails and then share the most interesting ones and my responses here. Clickety clack!

Chris Stirewalt is political editor for The Hill and NewsNation, the host of "The Hill Sunday" on NewsNation and The CW, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the author of books on politics and the media.

 
The Hill on FacebookThe Hill on X - TwitterThe Hill on InstagramThe Hill on LinkedIn The Hill on YouTube

Privacy Policy   |   View in Browser    |   Manage Subscriptions
Sign Up for Other Newsletters   |   Unsubscribe 

 

400 N Capitol Street NW Suite 650, Washington, DC 20001
Copyright © 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc.   |   All Rights Reserved.