The Hill's weekly courts news digest.
The Hill Insider
The Hill Insider
The Gavel
The Gavel

By Zach Schonfeld and Sophie Brams   |   Saturday, October 31

By Zach Schonfeld and Sophie Brams

Saturday, October 31

 

Steven Hirsch, New York Post via Associated Press pool

Mangione state trial in limbo as judge weighs double jeopardy 

Luigi Mangione’s guilty plea in federal court has thrown his upcoming New York criminal case into doubt.

Mangione’s defense team wants the state charges dismissed on double jeopardy grounds, while prosecutors are vowing to press ahead.  

The reignited debate is unfolding just weeks before the 28-year-old was set to go to trial in state court for the 2024 murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

 
 

The Gavel is now part of The Hill Insider.
Beginning in August, the complete newsletter will become part of the premium offerings of The Hill Insider. To explore the benefits of subscribing, click here.

 

Selection of the anonymous jury was supposed to begin Sept. 8, but Judge Gregory Carro has now put that start date on hold until at least December.

Mangione pleaded guilty on Friday to two federal interstate stalking charges stemming from the midtown Manhattan shooting that occurred as Thompson walked into a hotel to address an annual investors conference.

His sentencing is scheduled for Dec. 18. Mangione faces a maximum sentence of life in prison, which federal prosecutors have pledged to seek; however, court documents indicate the suggested sentence would likely be between 24 and 30 years once mitigating factors are taken into account. 

To court watchers, the plea was an obvious strategic maneuver to trigger New York’s double jeopardy statute. The Fifth Amendment protects people from being tried or punished twice for the same offense, but the Empire State takes that further.

“The New York statute is stricter,” explained Anna Cominsky, a law professor and director of the criminal defense clinic at New York Law School.

“That’s one of the reasons why we've seen the jockeying between the federal government and state government in terms of who's going to go first,” she added. “Because if the state went first, the state would not have to worry about this issue with New York's double jeopardy law, but when the feds go first, now it comes into play.”

It didn’t take long for Mangione’s lawyers, led by Karen Friedman Agnifilo, to file a motion in state court asking Carro to dismiss second-degree murder and weapons charges.

“He has been treated differently from every other defendant charged with this offense in New York,” Agnifilo told reporters after Friday’s hearing. “However, thankfully, New York law doesn’t allow this.” 

Friday’s plea hearing marked a dramatic shift in the prosecution against Mangione, who first captivated the nation after a five-day manhunt led to his arrest at a Pennsylvania fast-food restaurant. 

Public opinion quickly became divided, with Mangione’s supporters arguing that his frustrations with the health insurance industry were enough to justify the killing of a wealthy executive.  

Mangione told U.S. District Judge Margaret Garnett on Friday that he posed as a potential multibillion-dollar investor to confirm the conference location and received an “immediate response” — drawing a direct parallel to his previous experiences with insurance companies as a sufferer of severe back pain.  

“On the morning of December 4, 2024, I shot Mr. Thompson in Manhattan and he died,” Mangione admitted. “When I did so, I understood that my actions would place him in fear of death or serious bodily injury. I knew what I was doing was illegal."

As he now hopes to toss his state case, Mangione’s lawyers contend he has been a “pawn in parallel prosecutions” by the state and federal governments that seek to “punish him separately for the same event.”  

The dispute hinges on the specific language of the New York statute, which bars separate prosecutions based on the “same act or criminal transaction” unless the offenses have “substantially different elements” and are “designed to prevent very different kinds of harm or evil,” among other exemptions.  

The defense argues that these exceptions don’t apply because both sets of current charges relate to the same “unlawful taking of a human life.” State prosecutors, on the other hand, will likely be trying to convince the judge that they are distinct. 

“Where I think the issue is going to come in is that the facts that Mangione pled guilty to, the allocution that he gave in federal court, mirrors the facts," Cominsky said. “Therefore, that argument about them being different offenses, having different elements, weakens significantly because the facts are sort of one and the same.” 

Carro called the double jeopardy arguments “premature” in earlier proceedings, but Mangione’s guilty plea may change that calculus.  

The judge has ordered the Manhattan district attorney’s office to respond to the dismissal motion by Oct. 9. The defense will then have an opportunity to reply, with a hearing to follow in early December.  

In the meantime, state prosecutors say they have been “tirelessly preparing” to pursue a trial conviction and are “committed to seeking justice” for Thompson.

“While federal sentencing is pending, we are prepared to litigate the defense motions,” a spokesperson for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s (D) office said on Friday.  

 

Welcome to The Gavel, The Hill’s weekly newsletter unpacking the intersection of courts & politics from Zach Schonfeld and Sophie Brams. Email us tips at zschonfeld@thehill.com and sbrams@thehill.com or reach out to us on X (@ZachASchonfeld and @sophiebrams) or Signal (zachschonfeld.48 and sbrams.32).

 

Not already on the list? Subscribe here.

 
 
 

IN FOCUS

 

META ON TRIAL

The tech world’s eyes were on Oakland, Calif., on Tuesday. 

Social media giant Meta is on trial over allegations that its platforms, Instagram and Facebook, were intentionally designed with addictive features to target young users, and that the company knowingly misled the public about the potential safety risks.  

“Meta’s business model can be summed up with four simple words: hook the users, hold them for as long as they can, harvest their data and then hide the truth,” California Deputy Attorney General Megan O’Neill said during opening arguments. 

O’Neill is one of several attorneys representing four mostly Democratic-led states — California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey — who sued the company in 2023. A total of 29 states have brought challenges, but the current trial is expected to act as a bellwether for the remaining cases.

The states have accused Meta of violating various consumer protection laws and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by illegally harvesting data from users under the age of 13 without parental consent.  

They also claim that Meta engaged in deceptive tactics by publicly claiming that its platforms were safe despite internal documents and research showing negative impacts on young users’ mental health.  

“Meta has designed and deployed dangerous product, a dangerous product with dangerous features that they knew would create excessive use and compulsive use by children, and it would create mental health harms,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) said at a press conference, flanked by Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser (D) and New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport (D). 

“They knew all that ... and they lied to the public. They lied to Congress,” he continued. 

Attorneys for Meta disputed allegations that it has prioritized profit over children’s safety and claims it hasn’t done enough to keep underage users off the platforms. But they acknowledged “real challenges” in age verification.  

“It’s a challenge across the entire industry,” said Paul Schmidt, a partner at Covington & Burling who is part of Meta’s defense team.

Meta has also argued it should be shielded under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which prevents companies from being held liable for third-party content on their sites. 

The attorneys general are reportedly seeking roughly $200 billion in damages and changes to Meta’s business practices. Court documents indicate Meta has pegged the potential penalties at upward of $1.4 trillion, though Bonta has pushed back on that estimate. 

Still, the amounts would exceed Meta’s annual profit last year, and the maximalist figure would be comparable to the size of the tech giant’s entire market cap. 

And beyond the possible monetary consequences for Meta, experts say the trial could have wide-reaching implications for the future of tech regulation.  

While a jury has been seated for the proceedings, the outcome will ultimately be decided by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. She’s an Obama appointee who has overseen other high-stakes disputes between billionaire Tesla founder Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, as well as an antitrust case between Apple and Epic Games that is now at the Supreme Court.

Over the course of six weeks, the court is expected to hear testimony from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram head Adam Mosseri. Plaintiffs are also expected to call a variety of current and former Meta employees, executives and industry experts to testify.

That testimony kicked off Tuesday with Arturo Béjar, a former senior engineering and product leader at Facebook turned whistleblower. He testified to Congress in 2023 that Meta’s top executives, including Zuckerberg, ignored warnings about the harms facing teenagers, such as harassment and unwanted sexual advances.

The company had sought to bar Béjar from taking the stand, which the judge called a “Hail Mary” attempt to “eliminate a strong witness” when she rejected the request.  

 
 

SIDEBAR

 

5 top docket updates

 
  • WH ballroom arrives at Supreme Court: The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court for an emergency order clearing the way for construction to resume on the White House ballroom. An appeals court’s 2-1 ruling blocking above-ground work is set to take effect Friday. 
  • Appeals court disqualifies US attorney: A federal appeals court has disqualified Sigal Chattah from the top federal prosecutorial job in Nevada. It’s the latest loss for the Justice Department’s effort to sidestep Senate confirmation. 
  • Supreme Court asked to review Ten Commandments law: The fight over Texas’s law requiring public school classrooms to post the Ten Commandments has landed at the high court. The American Civil Liberties Union has asked the justices to take up their challenge next term. 
  • Alien Enemies Act fight moot: Remember the big legal fight last year over Trump’s use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport alleged Venezuelan gang members? An appeals court ruled a key lawsuit is moot because the migrants were eventually deported under another law. Anticipation had grown that the decision would bring the fight back to the Supreme Court. But now, the appeals court is sidestepping that battle. 
  • ABC sues FCC: Disney sued the Federal Communications Commission over the agency’s early review of ABC broadcast licenses, alleging it violates the First Amendment. 
 

In other news

 
  • IndyCar race by the courthouse: You may recognize the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse from seeing it as reporters’ backdrop on cable news. This weekend, it’ll be the backdrop of the Freedom 250 Grand Prix D.C. race. The pit lane is directly in front of the building. 
  • Law firm expands cryptocurrency work: BakerHostetler launched a crypto asset disputes team this week to handle matters arising from “blockchain-enabled business models and transactions.” It says it’s the first among Am Law 100 firms to launch such a team.
 
 

ON THE DOCKET

 

Don’t be surprised if additional hearings are scheduled throughout the week. But here’s what I’m watching for now:

 

Today

 
  • A three-judge panel will hear an effort to dismiss a challenge to California’s new Democratic-friendly congressional map. The panel previously declined to block the map. 
  • An importer will go before a federal judge on the U.S. Court of International Trade to persuade him to certify a new class of importers to force the Trump administration to pay additional tariff refunds. 
  • Former Southern Poverty Law Center Chief Financial Officer Heidi Beirich is set to be arraigned on a superseding indictment 
 

Thursday

 
  • Cole Tomas Allen, the man charged with attempting to assassinate President Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, is due to make his next court appearance for a status conference. 
 

Friday

 
  • An appeals court ruling that would halt above-ground construction on the White House ballroom takes effect at the end of the day. The Trump administration has urged the Supreme Court to halt it. 
 

Monday

 
  • Ivan Kuznetsov and Angela Nikolau, the couple who gained national attention for illegally scaling the Empire State Building, are due to make their next court appearance in Manhattan Criminal Court. 
 

Tuesday

 
  • The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit will hear oral arguments in the Justice Department’s bid to block California’s law prohibiting immigration agents from wearing face coverings. 
  • The Trump administration is due to submit a written update to the U.S. Court of International Trade on the progress made refunding importers who paid tariffs invalidated by the Supreme Court. 
 
 

WHAT I'M READING

 
  • The Washington Post’s Julian Mark: Angry at the Supreme Court, liberals push a slew of plans for overhauling it 
  • Politico’s Kyle Cheney: ICE keeps racking up losses at the appeals courts on mandatory detention 
  • The New York Times’s Devlin Barrett: Little Thefts, Big Charges: Trump’s Justice Dept. Targets Lesser Fraud 
  • Reuters’ Dan Rosenzweig-Ziff, Brad Heath and Kristina Cooke: Insight: Trump promised a sex-trafficking crackdown. His Justice Department hasn't delivered 
  • NPR’s Jaclyn Diaz: Part of a key firearms law lapsed following a federal court decision. What happens now? 
The Gavel

We’ll be back next Wednesday with additional reporting and insights. In the meantime, keep up with our coverage here.

 

Questions? Tips? Love letters, hate mail, pet pics?

Email: zschonfeld@thehill.com or sbrams@thehill.com

On Signal: @zachschonfeld.48 or sbrams.32

 
The Hill on Facebook The Hill on X - TwitterThe Hill on InstagramThe Hill on LinkedInThe Hill on YouTube The Hill Insider on Substack

Privacy Policy   |   View in Browser    |   Manage Subscriptions
Sign Up for Other Newsletters   |   Unsubscribe 

 
The Hill Insider

400 N Capitol Street NW Suite 650, Washington, DC 20001
Copyright © 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc.   |   All Rights Reserved.