Plus: Colom flips Mississippi Senate race in upset

 MORNING REPORT

 MORNING REPORT

 

Thursday, November 12 | By Jared Gans and Sarah Fortinsky

View Online  |  Sign up

 

Listen and Subscribe:

The Hill on SpotifyThe Hill on Apple Podcasts The Hill on Amazon Music

In today's issue:

▪ Colom flips Mississippi in upset 

▪ White House planning pushback 

▪ Democrats regroup after Hegseth vote 

▪ Huang facing more scrutiny 

© The Associated Press | Jose Luis Magana

Van Hollen puts Schumer on notice

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) is putting Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) on alert as he considers a possible bid for the top role in the upper chamber. 

The second-term senator hasn't said that he will run to become the majority leader in the next session of Congress, but his moves and comments have senators wondering if he'll take a shot at the job.  

Van Hollen was once seen as a future Speaker of the House when he represented Maryland in the lower chamber. His decision to leave the House and run for the Senate was then seen as a sign of the difficulty in moving up the Democratic House ranks during the era of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).  

More recently, Van Hollen has openly discussed running for the White House in 2028. He'd be an underdog candidate in such a race, but it would give him more national prominence and could turn him into a Cabinet member if a Democrat were to win the Oval Office.  

Whether Van Hollen challenges Schumer could be a matter of whether he thinks he'd have the votes to win a backroom vote among Democratic senators.  

On Monday, Van Hollen told reporters Monday that he's in "listening mode" on vying for the job. 

“What I’ve said from the very beginning is, we shouldn’t have a coronation. We should have a caucus discussion about what we’re going to do with the power and responsibilities that have been invested in us,” he said. 

Comments he offered the following day were a bit sharper, as they targeted Schumer and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), the campaign arm of Senate Democrats. 

The remarks specifically highlighted how some Democratic senators-elect, notably Sen.-elect Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, won office despite the fact that Schumer and the DSCC supported other candidates in Democratic primaries.  

"We have two newly elected senators who would not be there if Schumer and the DSCC had their way. Schumer and the DSCC sided with the crypto industry and AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee]," Van Hollen told MS NOW's Ali Vitali. 

Schumer has been a bit of a punching bag for the Democratic base, and particularly progressives, for years. On the cold open of the post-midterm election "Saturday Night Live," Schumer and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) were parodied in a skit that suggested it would be better if both men stepped down from their positions.  

But the reality is that Schumer likely has the support to win any contest on the leadership position within the Senate Democratic Caucus. He also had a strong midterm season, as Democrats have now gained eight seats in the Senate with the victory on Wednesday by Scott Colom in Mississippi. They are favored to win a ninth seat in Alaska, where Democrat Mary Peltola has a narrow edge on GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan.  

But the unpopularity of Schumer with the base makes it not only easy for progressives to take shots at Schumer. It's also an attractive thing to do.  

El-Sayed told CNN last week that Van Hollen would be an "amazing" leader. El-Sayed has been singing Van Hollen's praises for months, introducing him as the "next Senate majority leader" at a campaign rally in July. 

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) declared his support for Van Hollen, if he runs, in an interview with Jon Stewart on Tuesday, arguing that the Democratic Party needs "new leadership" to advance the party in a "much more vigorous way" to protect working families. 

“We cannot have leadership in the Democratic Party who are going to do the same old, same old,” Sanders said. 

Progressives aren't the only ones who at least are interested in looking elsewhere from Schumer, who has led Democrats in the chamber since taking over for Harry Reid in 2017. 

Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), a more moderate member, appeared at a press conference with Sanders on Tuesday in which both said they hoped for a competitive leader election. Slotkin said she had a "really productive conversation" with Van Hollen but declined to endorse him, saying she wants a concrete plan for governing from any candidate. 

Democratic Sens.-elect Adam Hamilton (Kan.) and James Talarico (Texas) have also withheld their support for Schumer, leaning into the push for generational change within the party. 

Van Hollen has received more attention, particularly over the past year, during the second Trump administration. 

He faced off with key members of the administration in April 2025 when he traveled to El Salvador to meet with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was wrongfully deported last year. Van Hollen was at first denied a meeting or phone call with Abrego Garcia but was later permitted to meet with him. He clashed with Secretary of State Marco Rubio during a congressional testimony the next month. 

Van Hollen has also gained attention as among the harsher critics of Israel's conduct during its war against Hamas and the U.S. relationship with its Middle Eastern ally. He's been one of the relatively few senators to vote for resolutions from Sanders to place conditions on aid to Israel and block weapons sales, including just a few months into the war. 

He introduced a resolution in September to direct the State Department to report on violence and human rights conditions in the West Bank, which narrowly failed mostly along party lines. 

The Hill's Alexander Bolton reports that Schumer is telling colleagues privately that he has already locked up the votes needed for him to become majority leader as he tries to snuff out any momentum for a challenger. Meanwhile, progressives are using the potential for a challenge to push Schumer to agree to a more ambitiously liberal agenda, including “Medicare for All.”

Senate Democrats told Bolton that Slotkin has also emerged as a possible contender, though she says she's "not actively seeking" the role. 

Insiders can read more about the battle here. 

▪ The Hill: Democrats get a new faith playbook. 

▪ The Hill Insider: Elizabeth Warren has Corporate America in her sights. 

Dig into the midterm data yourself

Explore 2026 election results, voting trends and historical comparisons with Decision Desk HQ, available through The Hill Insider Premium.

Try Insider Free

3 Things to Know Today

 
  1. First responders are digging through the rubble of a three-story building that collapsed by a construction site in Brooklyn to search for anyone trapped underneath. At least five people have been confirmed dead, and 19 have been injured.
  2. The Russian Foreign Ministry announced the death of its ambassador to the U.S., Alexander Darchiev, at the age of 66. The ministry said Darchiev, who has served as ambassador since March 2025, died “suddenly” of a chronic illness but didn’t elaborate.
  3. A group including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was loudly admonished by the Army sentinel at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery. The group was at the cemetery for the annual Veterans Day ceremony and could be heard in videos online talking and laughing loudly. Decorum is intensely observed at the tomb.

LEADING THE DAY

© The Associated Press | Ellen Schmidt

MISSISSIPPI DELTA: Democrat Scott Colom will flip Mississippi Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith's (R) seat in a major upset victory that further pads the incoming Democratic majority in the Senate.

Decision Desk HQ projected the race for Colom after a week of votes continuing to be counted after Election Day. Mississippi law allowed provisional and absentee ballots postmarked by Election Day to be accepted through Tuesday, and officials continued processing and counting those ballots Wednesday.

Hyde-Smith conceded her defeat to Colom in a video posted on social media Wednesday evening.

“While this is not the outcome we worked for or hoped for, I respect the decision of Mississippi voters,” she said the video. “I want to congratulate Scott Colom and wish him well as he takes on the tremendous responsibility of representing our great state.”

Colom had tightened the gap behind Hyde-Smith on election night, and his lead only ticked up in the days that followed as more ballots were counted. He leads by about 4,500 votes, as of the latest tally.

Colom is the first Democrat to win a Senate seat in Mississippi since 1982. He also made history as the first Black person to be elected to the Senate from Mississippi since Reconstruction.

▪ The Hill: Mary Peltola surpasses combined Dan Sullivan votes.

▪ The Hill: Jim Justice says GOP can ‘forget’ Senate majority in 2028.

INVESTIGATING THE INVESTIGATORS: The White House is signaling it intends to take an aggressive stance against efforts by the incoming Democratic-led Congress to investigate the Trump administration, warning that the way they wield their subpoena power “may cross the line into blatant criminality.”

In a letter to incoming House Oversight Chair Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), White House counsel Will Scharf said any subpoena “designed merely to abuse or instill fear in the recipient” could be criminal, adding that “issuing unlawful subpoenas with the intention of depriving citizens of their constitutional rights and privileges may warrant further investigation.”

“Compulsory process is a power Congress has for oversight functions, and only for oversight functions,” Scharf wrote in his letter to Garcia. “Abusive threats and public statements about the indiscriminate issuance of subpoenas, along with threats directed at prospective targets within the Administration make it abundantly clear that any forthcoming investigative processes will be deployed to harass and aggrandize, rather than to advance any legitimate legislative end.”

Democrats have discussed publicly their intention to investigate the Trump administration. Garcia, on the night of the election, issued a two-word statement, telling White House officials to “lawyer up.”

Garcia issued a defiant response yesterday, saying, "It appears Donald Trump has something to hide,” and asserting Congress’s authority to conduct oversight, which, he noted, “comes from Article I of the Constitution, not from the permission of the White House.”

“The American people voted overwhelmingly for us to pass laws to root out corruption and abuse... We are a co-equal branch of government and will not be deterred by baseless threats from a weaponized DOJ [Department of Justice] or from the President’s lawyers,” he wrote.

Punchbowl News was first to report on the letter yesterday, but Garcia’s spokesperson later noted that the Oversight Committee “has not received this letter yet.”

▪ The Hill: House Democrat responds to White House warning: ‘Come at me, bro.’

▪ The Hill: Democrats investigate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. donor over expensive gifts.

▪ The Hill: Alina Habba Mildon loses $50M contract after Trump criticism.

CONTINUED FALLOUT: House Democrats are fuming after 11 members of their caucus were absent when the House voted, 211-204, to refer Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s impeachment articles to committee, effectively killing the measure until next year.

The Hill’s Mike Lillis and Sudiksha Kochi report that the issue is far from over, as a growing chorus of Democrats are now calling on the party to prioritize his impeachment when they take the gavel in January. But some party leaders are pushing instead for a more deliberate approach to executive oversight.

"It’s totally unacceptable, and we need to raise it up back again as soon as possible and make sure everyone gets on it," Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said.

▪ The Hill: The Memo: Misfire on Hegseth vote adds to Democratic tensions.

▪ The Hill: Hegseth survives the battle. Democrats aren’t done with the war.

'DIRTY TRICKS': House Democrats are up in arms after Republicans used a fast-track tactic to pass legislation intended to increase pay for disabled and injured veterans.

Democrats opposed the Take Care of America's Veterans Act because they said it would expand some veterans benefits at the cost of slashing others. Leadership was whipping its members to vote no.

But when the Republican lawmaker presiding over the House brought the bill up for consideration, no Democrat demanded a recorded vote, a curious rarity that allowed it to be passed instantly by voice vote.

Democrats alleged that Republicans pulled Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.), the ranking member of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, away from the podium to discuss changes to the bill when the legislation was fast-tracked.

“On Veterans Day of all days, using dirty tricks to steal from Veterans is a disgrace," a Democratic leadership aide said.

▪ The Hill: Thomas Massie secures another vote on the Epstein files.

 

WHEN & WHERE

  • The president will receive an intelligence briefing at 11 a.m. He will participate in a pre-taped radio interview at 12:30 p.m. and in another pre-taped interview at 1:30 p.m.
  • The House will convene at 9 a.m.
  • The Senate will meet at noon.

ZOOM IN

© The Associated Press | Julia Demaree Nikhinson

STANDING BY: The president is defending Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang as the Big Tech leader and Trump ally is facing widespread scrutiny over his affair with an alleged Chinese spy.

Jensen Huang has been in turmoil since a New York Times report that U.S. officials discovered Chinese business executive Alice Huang, who is not related to the Nvidia head, illegally smuggled advanced AI chips into China while developing a "close relationship" with Jensen Huang.

The Nvidia CEO acknowledged that he was "unfaithful" to his wife and seemed to confirm the affair with Alice Huang. Nvidia has launched an independent investigation into the allegations.

But Trump has stood by Jensen Huang, calling him an "honorable guy."

Adding to the controversy facing Huang, the Times reported Wednesday that he also had an extramarital affair with another executive at Nvidia. The Wall Street Journal reported later Wednesday that the company's board is preparing to oust him.

Shares of Nvidia stock tanked early Wednesday evening following the second Times report.

The Hill's Mallory Wilson and Miranda Nazzaro report that the situation raises questions about Trump's close relationship with industry leaders and whether it could undermine their push for greater AI development in the U.S.

“I think the president’s impulse was to quell markets, and you know he’s not the one running any investigation,” said Ryan Fedasiuk, a senior fellow at Foundation for American Innovation.

▪ The Hill: Who is Alice Huang?

▪ The Hill: Larry Kudlow calls on Jensen Huang to step down.

ELSEWHERE

© The Associated Press | J. Scott Applewhite

WHAT COMES NEXT: Some of the biggest names in the Democratic Party will gather in Denver, Colo., ahead of this weekend for what is being pegged as “the defining convening of the post-election season” for leaders “who will write the party’s next chapter.”

The two-day “What’s Next” convention, which starts this afternoon, features welcome remarks from Mayor Mike Johnston and remarks from Bryan Stevenson on “The Burden and Power of Hope.”

Talarico, Iowa Gov.-elect Rob Sand and Nevada Lt. Gov.-elect Sandra Jauregui will give remarks on “how we did it,” while former President Biden’s infrastructure coordinator, Mitch Landrieu, will join Virginia House Speaker Don Scott to discuss delivering for the people.

Iowa Sen.-elect Josh Turek will join a freshman orientation panel, while former Attorney General Eric Holder and Rep. Jamie Raskin (Md.) will discuss “keeping our democracy,” before Sen. Michael Bennet (Colo.) delivers closing remarks.

Tomorrow will feature another slate of high-profile figures: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.) will speak on “The 120th Congress,” Rep. Jake Auchincloss (Mass.) will discuss being “a different kind of Democrat,” while Van Hollen and Sen. Andy Kim (N.J.) will join Rep. Ro Khanna (Calif.) to discuss “the trust deficit.”

David Axelrod will moderate a panel on “executive decisions” featuring New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill, Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser and Democratic candidate for Alaska governor, Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins.

Slotkin and Sen. Ruben Gallego (Ariz.) will join Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro to discuss “the next era of the Democratic Party,” before Sens. Raphael Warnock (Ga.) and Cory Booker (N.J.) discuss the “moral majority,” and former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg joins Rep. Sarah McBride (Del.) to discuss “what’s next.”

▪ The Hill: 40 percent looking forward to 2028 election.

OPINION

  • Stephen Miller's White House will test Mexico's red lines, Gladys McCormick writes in The Hill.
  • The end of the death penalty in California is a fresh start for justice, Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen writes in The Hill.

THE CLOSER

© The Associated Press | J. Scott Applewhite

And finally … It’s Thursday, which means it’s time for the weekly news quiz!

Impeachments were back in the political conversation this week with the failed measure to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. So this week's quiz will test your knowledge about the congressional tool that's become a bit more of a hot topic in recent years.

Be sure to email your responses to jgans@thehill.com — please add “Quiz” to your subject line.

Which Biden Cabinet official was the most recent one to be impeached?

1. Lloyd Austin

2. Merrick Garland

3. Xavier Becerra

4. Alejandro Mayorkas

Which controversial former vice president pushed for an impeachment inquiry into himself that was ultimately granted and resulted in him being cleared?

1. John C. Calhoun

2. John Tyler

3. Spiro Agnew

4. Dick Cheney

Former Attorney General Harry Daughtery survived a push for his impeachment only to be forced to resign after he was implicated in what scandal?

1. Petticoat Affair

2. Crédit Mobilier

3. Teapot Dome

4. Watergate

Which of the following is not specifically listed by the Constitution as a reason for impeachment?

1. Treason

2. Bribery

3. Abuse of power

 

Stay Engaged

We want to hear from you! Email me here and suggest this newsletter to friends!

FacebookXInstagramLinkedInYouTubeSubstack

Privacy Policy   |   View in Browser   |   Manage Subscriptions

Sign Up for Other Newsletters   |   Unsubscribe

 

400 N Capitol Street NW Suite 650, Washington, DC 20001

Copyright © 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc.   |   All Rights Reserved

https://nxslink.thehill.com/oc/6230d8d7b246d104952e4da1staf4.9dv/94768844